Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Rev. bras. cir. plást ; 34(2): 274-282, apr.-jun. 2019. ilus, tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1015990

ABSTRACT

Introdução: Essa revisão sistemática foi conduzida para avaliar se a associação da aplicação da injeção de agregados plaquetários quando comparada a outras terapias faciais favorece no rejuvenescimento facial em pacientes adultos. Métodos: A pesquisa buscou ensaios clínicos randomizados que compararam uso de técnicas de rejuvenescimento facial isoladas com as mesmas técnicas aliadas à injeção de agregados plaquetários. A busca foi realizada em bases de dados indexadas e literatura cinzenta. A ferramenta de risco de viés da "Cochrane Collaboration" foi aplicada para a avaliação da qualidade dos estudos. Resultados: Foram identificados 7137 artigos. Apenas quatro estudos permaneceram na síntese qualitativa, e os demais foram considerados com risco indefinido de viés nos domínios chaves. Conclusão: Existem poucos estudos na literatura que comparam o uso de agregados plaquetários em rejuvenescimento facial e os que estão disponíveis têm risco de viés "indefinido" ou "alto". Há necessidade de realizar mais estudos clínicos bem delineados que comparem o uso de injeção de agregados plaquetários associados ou não às técnicas de rejuvenescimento facial.


Introduction: This systematic review was conducted to assess whether the use of a platelet aggregate injection with or without associated facial rejuvenation techniques favors facial rejuvenation in adult patients. Methods: Randomized clinical trials that compared the use of techniques for facial rejuvenation alone with the same techniques coupled with the injection of platelet aggregates were searched. The search was performed in indexed databases and in the gray literature. The Cochrane Collaboration bias risk tool was applied to assess the quality of the studies. Results: In total, 7137 articles were identified. Only four studies remained in the qualitative synthesis, and the others were considered as having undefined bias risk in the key domains. Conclusion: There are few studies in the literature that compare the use of platelet aggregates in facial rejuvenation and those that are available have a risk of "undefined" or "high" bias. There is a need for more well-designed clinical studies comparing the use of platelet aggregate injection with or without associated facial rejuvenation techniques.


Subject(s)
Male , Female , Adult , Rejuvenation/physiology , Rejuvenation/psychology , Clinical Protocols/standards , Platelet-Rich Plasma/cytology , Platelet-Rich Plasma/immunology , Plasma Skin Regeneration/adverse effects , Plasma Skin Regeneration/methods , Platelet-Rich Fibrin/cytology
2.
RSBO (Impr.) ; 12(4): 346-351, Oct.-Dec. 2015. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-842389

ABSTRACT

Introduction and Objective: To use scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and determine whether the surfaces of titanium implants are damaged when touched with a steel rongeur, titanium tweezers, or surgical gloves. Material and methods: Ten dental implants were divided into five groups: Control (C), Titanium Tweezers (T-T), Steel Rongeurs (S-R), Surgical Gloves (S-G), and Steel Support (S-S). The implants were assembled in a metallic base (stub) with the aid of copper strips. They were then imaged and their microstructures were characterized using SEM. Results: An analysis of the obtained images showed that the implants that had been handled with titanium tweezers or a steel rongeur suffered some damage to their physical structure; "scratches" and other small signs of damage were visible on their surfaces. The affected areas were very small compared to the total surface area of the implants. Small dark local stains were observed at the spots where some of the implants had rubbed against a steel support. The rubbing of the implants against the support did not cause any structural damage. The implants handled with surgical gloves exhibited many dark stains their surfaces. This suggested that the powder from the surgical gloves had contaminated the surfaces of the implants. Conclusion: Using SEM imaging, it was determined that the surfaces of dental implants suffer minor physical damage when handled with various pieces of dental equipment. However, the damage should not result in failure of the osseointegration process. In vivo studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL